Our website use cookies to improve and personalize your experience and to display advertisements(if any). Our website may also include cookies from third parties like Google Adsense, Google Analytics, Youtube. By using the website, you consent to the use of cookies. We have updated our Privacy Policy. Please click on the button to check our Privacy Policy.

Citizens sue City of Detroit and Wayne County, MI for voter fraud.

Cheryl A. Constatino and Edward P. McCall Jr., both citizens of the Wayne County, Michigan and Poll Challengers have applied, through their Attorneys at the Great Lakes Justice Center, for Special Leave to File Quo Warranto Complaints against the following:

The City of Detroit and the Detroit Election Commission
Janice M. Winfrey in her capacity as Clerk of the City of Detroit and Chair of the Detroit Election Commission
Cathy M. Garrett in her capacity as Clerk of Wayne County
Wayne County Board of Canvassers

Before being allowed to file suit against individuals in their capacity as government employees, citizens must request Special Leave of the Circuit Court, in this case the 3rd Circuit Court, to File Quo Warranto Complaints, in Latin meaning ” By What Authority “. Normally this type of suit can only be brought by the state AG or the lead county prosecutor, however Michigan Law allows for Citizens to do so with permission of the court.

If granted, the above defendants will be served with a suit alleging the following voter fraud charges:

In summary, this Complaint raises numerous instances of fraud, including, but not limited to:

a. Defendants systematically processed and counted ballots from voters whose name failed to appear in either the Qualified Voter File (QVF) or in the supplemental sheets. When a voter’s name could not be found, the election worker assigned the ballot to a random name already in the QVF to a person who had not voted.

b. Defendants instructed election workers to not verify signatures on absentee ballots, to backdate absentee ballots, and to process such ballots regardless of their validity.

c. After election officials announced the last absentee ballots had been received, another batch of unsecured and unsealed ballots, without envelopes, arrived in trays at the TCF Center. There were tens of thousands of these absentee ballots, and apparently every ballot was counted and attributed only to Democratic candidates.

d. Defendants instructed election workers to process ballots that appeared after the election deadline and to falsely report that those ballots had been received prior to November 3, 2020 deadline.

e. Defendants systematically used false information to process ballots, such as using incorrect or false birthdays. Many times, the election workers inserted new names into the QVF after the election and recorded these new voters as having a birthdate of 1/1/1900.

f. On a daily basis leading up to the election, City of Detroit election workers and employees coached voters to vote for Joe Biden and the Democrat party. These workers and employees encouraged voters to do a straight Democrat ballot. These election workers and employees went over to the voting booths with voters in order to watch them vote and coach them for whom to vote.

g. Unsecured ballots arrived at the TCF Center loading garage, not in sealed ballot boxes, without any chain of custody, and without envelopes.

h. Defendant election officials and workers refused to record challenges to their processes and removed challengers from the site if they politely voiced a challenge.

i. After poll challengers started discovering the fraud taking place at the TCF Center, Defendant election officials and workers locked credentialed challengers out of the counting room so they could not observe the process, during which time tens of thousands of ballots were processed.

j. Defendant election officials and workers allowed ballots to be duplicated by hand without allowing poll challengers to check if the duplication was accurate. In fact, election officials and workers repeatedly obstructed poll challengers from observing. Defendants permitted thousands of ballots to be filled out by hand and duplicated on site without oversight from poll challengers.

This is just the summary of allegations, full text of each allegation can be seen in the PDF of the full filling.

To bolster these claims, the Plaintiffs has included 6 sworn affidavits, from poll challengers and elections workers.

Most notable of which is a highly detailed sworn affidavit by Zachary Larsen. Larsen served as the Assistant State Attorney General for Michigan from Jan 2012 until Jan 2020 and is currently a licensed Attorney in the state. He volunteered as a Poll Challenger for the State Republican Party and recounts a laundry list of fraud.


Related Posts